Introducing a new 7-ring fused diindenone-dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]thiophene unit as a promising component for organic semiconductor materials

• Valentin H. K. Fell,
• Joseph Cameron,
• Alexander L. Kanibolotsky,
• Eman J. Hussien and
• Peter J. Skabara

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2022, 18, 944–955, doi:10.3762/bjoc.18.94

• donor–acceptor interaction [21]. With this strategy, fusing those systems should lead to greater π-delocalisation [15][22]. Moreover, the fused core system is flanked by thiophene groups with ethylhexyl groups which impart solubility [5] in common organic solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, chloroform or

Biochemistry of fluoroprolines: the prospect of making fluorine a bioelement

• Vladimir Kubyshkin,
• Rebecca Davis and
• Nediljko Budisa

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 439–460, doi:10.3762/bjoc.17.40

• potential due to the hydrogen atoms at the exterior (Figure 4). This local charge plays an important role in the interaction of proline with the environment in a protein. For example, when a side chain of an aromatic residue docks onto the proline residue, they engage in a donor–acceptor interaction, while

Mechanochemistry of supramolecules

• Anima Bose and
• Prasenjit Mal

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 881–900, doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.86

• –acceptor [2]rotaxanes such as 19 through liquid-assisted mechanochemical milling (Figure 9). The donor–acceptor interaction between the electron-deficient naphthalene diimide moiety and the electron-rich naphthalene moieties embedded in the macrocyclic polyethers played the vital role for the construction

Tetrathiafulvalene – a redox-switchable building block to control motion in mechanically interlocked molecules

• Hendrik V. Schröder and
• Christoph A. Schalley

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 2163–2185, doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.190

• solutions due to the donor–acceptor interaction. In later reports, differently substituted TTF derivatives as for example 2, 4, and 5 have been investigated towards their binding to host 3 [24][59][60][61][62][63]. π-Electron-rich TTFs form significantly stronger donor–acceptor complexes as π-electron-poor

A new class of organogelators based on triphenylmethyl derivatives of primary alcohols: hydrophobic interactions alone can mediate gelation

• Wangkhem P. Singh and
• Rajkumar S. Singh

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 138–149, doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.17

• -stacking, donor–acceptor interaction, electrostatic, metal coordination, hydrophobic forces or van der Waals’ interactions [4][5][6]. We know a great deal about the aggregation behaviour of gelator molecules from many studies conducted during the past several years. However, rational design and accurate

• ][21][22]. As mentioned above, developing a new gelator is still largely a trial and error method. The most widely used design strategy involves the inclusion of structural components favouring intermolecular non-covalent interactions (like H-bonding, π-stacking, donor–acceptor interaction, metal

Molecular weight control in organochromium olefin polymerization catalysis by hemilabile ligand–metal interactions

• Stefan Mark,
• Hubert Wadepohl and
• Markus Enders

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 1372–1379, doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.131

• [1] and has been applied for the development of improved transition metal catalysts [2][3][4][5][6][7]. The donor–acceptor interaction of the hemilabile moiety with the metal center should be weak enough to allow the displacement by a substrate, which should itself be transformed during the catalytic

Supramolecular chemistry: from aromatic foldamers to solution-phase supramolecular organic frameworks

• Zhan-Ting Li

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2057–2071, doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.222

• cavity of cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) are highlighted. Keywords: donor–acceptor interaction; foldamer; hydrogen bond; radical cation dimerization; supramolecular organic framework; Review Childhood and growing up I was born on July 23rd, 1966 in the small, remote village of Fang-Liu (a combination of two

• the University of South Denmark: donor–acceptor interaction-driven catenanes From October 1994 to December 1995, I performed postdoctoral research with Professor Jan Becher at Odense University (currently University of South Denmark) in Denmark. Through his research career, Professor Becher studied

• : applications for molecular recognition and self-assembly Donor–acceptor interaction and π-stacking for folding. In January 2001, I returned to SIOC again. When I left SIOC for Urbana in 2000, I had built a small research group with two graduates. Thanks to the persistence of Professor Xi-Kui Jiang [19][20

Donor–acceptor type co-crystals of arylthio-substituted tetrathiafulvalenes and fullerenes

• Xiaofeng Lu,
• Jibin Sun,
• Shangxi Zhang,
• Longfei Ma,
• Lei Liu,
• Hui Qi,
• Yongliang Shao and
• Xiangfeng Shao

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 1043–1051, doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.117

• to the short axis of C70 (10 Å), thus C70 molecules form one-dimensional (1D) columnar arrays along this direction. The structural features for both donor–acceptor interaction mode and fullerene arrangement of 7·C60, 8·C60, and 1·C70 are very similar to that of 5·C70. Type II co-crystals Among the

• space group P-1. The asymmetric unit contains half a molecule of 1, two halves of C60 (A and B), and one CS2 molecule. The central C6S4 moieties of both molecules 1 (A and B) are nearly planar. Molecule A is disordered and surrounded by four molecules of 1. The donor–acceptor interaction mode for

• plays a significant role on the donor–acceptor interaction mode and the packing motif of the fullerenes. In the type I co-crystals (D:A = 1:1), the donor–acceptor interactions mainly exist between the central TTF core of the Ar-S-TTF and the fullerene molecules. Therefore, Ar-S-TTF serves as the host

Trifluoromethyl-substituted tetrathiafulvalenes

• Olivier Jeannin,
• Frédéric Barrière and
• Marc Fourmigué

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 647–658, doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.73

• -transfer salt. Note also that this donor–acceptor interaction leads to a strong planarization of the dithiole rings of 1c in (1c)2(TCNQ) with folding angles along the S…S hinge of the two dithiole rings amounting now to 10.13(17)° and 1.90(16)° on the dithioethylene and CF3 sides, respectively. By

Charge-transfer interaction mediated organogels from 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid appended pyrene

• Jun Hu,
• Jindan Wu,
• Qian Wang and
• Yong Ju

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2877–2885, doi:10.3762/bjoc.9.324

• driving forces for the formation of such self-assembled fibrillar networks include hydrogen-bonding interaction, van der Waals force, π–π stacking, and donor–acceptor interaction [7][8][9][10]. Since LMWGs are often thermally reversible and the gelation can be triggered by pH or the addition of small

Conjugated polymers containing diketopyrrolopyrrole units in the main chain

• Bernd Tieke,
• A. Raman Rabindranath,
• Kai Zhang and
• Yu Zhu

Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 830–845, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.92

• diphenylDPP and thiophene, bisthiophene, or 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) units in alternating fashion (Table 2). Because of the strong donor-acceptor interaction between the thiophene and the DPP units, the absorption and emission maxima were shifted to longer wavelength: A solution of EDOT-DPP copolymer